walter-erquinigo wrote:

@JDevlieghere , now that I think of it twice, I like the approach you mention 
better. I'll use `lldb_private::plugin::dwarf` for the namespace then. Do you 
still want these nested namespaces to be defined in three lines instead of one? 
I could keep consistency as you mention, but I don't know if that would be 
visually too much.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68150
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to