================
@@ -34,7 +34,9 @@ class SyntheticChildrenFrontEnd {
public:
SyntheticChildrenFrontEnd(ValueObject &backend)
- : m_backend(backend), m_valid(true) {}
+ : m_backend(backend), m_valid(true) {
+ backend.SetSyntheticFrontend(this);
+ }
----------------
bulbazord wrote:
Ignoring whether or not ValueObject should hold a pointer to a
SyntheticFrontEnd, I'm concerned about the lifetime management of this
solution. If a SyntheticChildrenFrontEnd is destroyed, the underlying
`ValueObject` will be holding a dangling pointer.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67309
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
