vgvassilev wrote: @bnbarham, I think it would be useful to keep it.
> If we think this is useful to keep I'll need to look into how > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65683 broke LLDB testing: Incremental processing should also enable the llvm expression parser workflows. The advantage is that now we can write tests against `clang-repl` which combines the clang frontend and the llvm jit. If we capture the lldb workflows in these tests we will reduce the amount of regressions that inadvertently happen because of these two components are not tested together. > That change should effectively be NFC as far as -fincremental-extensions is > concerned, so if you have any ideas that would be appreciated :) If you can provide links to the failing tests I can take a look. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66271 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
