ted added a comment. In D159101#4625539 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D159101#4625539>, @DavidSpickett wrote:
> Also could you provide a list of things you have tested with qemu. So I can > get an idea of how sure we can be any of this works / be a test plan, albeit > manual for anyone updating this code in future. I'll answer this first, because it's the easiest! I've done the following: - Run 32 and 64 bit Linux binaries, launched on user space riscv32 and riscv64 QEMU, using the QemuUser platform. - Hit a breakpoint - Continue - Step in, step over, step out, instruction step in, instruction step out, including stepping all the way down and back up a 10 level recursive call - Looked at a backtrace - Looked at variables with frame variable - Looked at and modified variables with the expression parser - Read and writte memory @jasonmolenda the step plan issue we discussed was actually a disassembler issue, and was fixed by D156086 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D156086>. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D159101/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D159101 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
