bulbazord added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/CTF/CTFTypes.h:1
+//===-- CTFType.h -----------------------------------------------*- C++
-*-===//
+//
----------------
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/CTF/CTFTypes.h:9-10
+
+#ifndef LLDB_SOURCE_PLUGINS_SYMBOLFILE_CTF_CTFTYPE_H
+#define LLDB_SOURCE_PLUGINS_SYMBOLFILE_CTF_CTFTYPE_H
+
----------------
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/CTF/CTFTypes.h:101
+ struct Value {
+ Value(llvm::StringRef name, uint32_t value) : name(name), value(value){};
+ llvm::StringRef name;
----------------
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/CTF/SymbolFileCTF.cpp:931
-void SymbolFileCTF::AddTypeForUID(lldb::user_id_t type_uid, lldb::TypeSP type)
{
- assert(type_uid == m_types.size() + 1);
- m_types.emplace_back(type);
-}
+lldb_private::Type *SymbolFileCTF::ResolveTypeUID(lldb::user_id_t type_uid) {
+ auto find_result = m_types.find(type_uid);
----------------
Why do we return a `Type *` instead of a `TypeSP`?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D156447/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D156447
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
