hokein added a comment.

In D153740#4448408 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D153740#4448408>, @avl wrote:

> added @jkorous who originally added llvm::writeFileAtomically.
>
>> Let me know what you think about it -- I considered keeping the 
>> llvm::writeFileAtomically and migrating its underlying implementation to 
>> llvm::writeToOutput, but it doesn't seem to worth, there are only 4 in-tree 
>> usages of this API, I think it is probably better just remove it.
>
> I think it is OK to leave only one API (f.e. llvm::writeToOutput) and remove 
> another. It would probably be better to split this patch to  lldb, thinlto, 
> clang and removal parts.

Sounds good. I will split it once https://reviews.llvm.org/D153652 is landed.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D153740/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D153740

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to