Michael137 added a comment. In D143347#4298613 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D143347#4298613>, @kpdev42 wrote:
> So what are next steps? Are we going for implementation of > `DW_AT_no_unique_address` (which is going to be a non-standard extension) ? > @dblaikie @aprantl @Michael137 in my opinion that would be the most convenient way forward. Perhaps something like `DW_AT_LLVM_no_unique_address` even? Btw what does GCC/gdb do in this case? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D143347/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D143347 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
