mib added a comment.

In D148399#4284809 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D148399#4284809>, @bulbazord wrote:

> We'd go from:
>
>   LLDB_LOGF(log,
>             "Process::SetPrivateState (plugin = %s, state = %s) state didn't "
>             "change. Ignoring...",
>             GetPluginName().data(), StateAsCString(new_state));
>
> to
>
>   LLDB_LOG(log, "(plugin = %s, state = %s) state didn't "
>             "change. Ignoring...",
>             GetPluginName().data(), StateAsCString(new_state));
>
> `LLDB_LOG` automatically inserts the file and func into the log. There are 
> plenty of places where we copy/paste logs like these into other files without 
> remembering to update this piece of information, so removing it from the log 
> line entirely helps prevent those kinds of issues in the future. It's a minor 
> thing, but if the point of this patch is to improve the logging mechanism 
> entirely, then I think we should also think about these kinds of things. See 
> 0a74fbb7b1d3e04ac03389f1fc455ac593c2e5ee 
> <https://reviews.llvm.org/rG0a74fbb7b1d3e04ac03389f1fc455ac593c2e5ee> for an 
> example of what I mean.

I didn't understand that originally (since what you guys are suggesting doesn't 
have anything to do with my change), but I'll update it in this patch.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D148399/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D148399

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to