JDevlieghere added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Platform/CMakeLists.txt:9 add_subdirectory(POSIX) +add_subdirectory(scripted) add_subdirectory(QemuUser) ---------------- ================ Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Platform/scripted/ScriptedPlatform.cpp:208 + ProcessInstanceInfoList &proc_infos) { + CheckInterpreterAndScriptObject(); + StructuredData::DictionarySP dict_sp = GetInterface().ListProcesses(); ---------------- What's your intention by calling this function? In a release build this is still going to crash. Is there a way to initialize the platform with an invalid `m_script_object_sp` or `m_interpreter`? If so then we should have proper error handling. If not then these can be regular asserts. ================ Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Platform/scripted/ScriptedPlatform.h:49-52 + lldb_private::Target *target, // Can be nullptr, if + // nullptr create a new + // target, else use + // existing one ---------------- This should be a Doxygen comment. ================ Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Platform/scripted/ScriptedPlatform.h:70-74 + void CheckInterpreterAndScriptObject() const; + ScriptedPlatformInterface &GetInterface() const; + llvm::Expected<ProcessInstanceInfo> + ParseProcessInfo(StructuredData::Dictionary &dict, lldb::pid_t pid) const; + static bool IsScriptLanguageSupported(lldb::ScriptLanguage language); ---------------- This is hard to parse, do they really need to be grouped together? I'd add a newline between them like the public functions. ================ Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Platform/scripted/ScriptedPlatform.h:76 + + // Member variables. + const ScriptedMetadata *m_scripted_metadata = nullptr; ---------------- Useless comment ================ Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Platform/scripted/ScriptedPlatform.h:80 + lldb_private::StructuredData::ObjectSP m_script_object_sp = nullptr; + //@} +}; ---------------- Missing group opener (`@{`), but you can just remove it if you do the same for line 76 CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D139252/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D139252 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits