Michael137 added a comment.

In D139083#3964612 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D139083#3964612>, @aprantl wrote:

> This is definitely useful — I just have one question: Isn't ForEach a special 
> case of AnyOf? Could we implement on in terms of the other?

Yup it is. But it looked a bit too clever and just iterating over `m_modules` 
seemed cleaner.

  bool ret = false;
  ForEach([&](auto const& module) {
      if (callback(module)) {
          ret = true;
          return false;
      }
  
      return true;
  }
  
  return ret;

It looked a bit awkward



================
Comment at: lldb/include/lldb/Core/ModuleList.h:480
+  /// This function is thread-safe.
+  bool AnyOf(std::function<bool(const lldb::ModuleSP &module_sp)> const
+                 &callback) const;
----------------
Michael137 wrote:
> aprantl wrote:
> > Why not `std::function<bool(const lldb::Module &)>` ?
> Unfortunately a lot of APIs of `Module` are non-const since they rely on 
> updating internal state :(
Re. why shared_ptr, that's because I just waned to align it with `ForEach`. I 
suppose if we're starting fresh we could just pass the reference. It would have 
to be mutable though


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D139083/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D139083

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to