jasonmolenda added a comment. In D138612#3950102 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D138612#3950102>, @jasonmolenda wrote:
> > I didn't look into this patch enough to say whether this is a real failure, > or if the test assumes behavior that is only true with the accelerator tables > used in DWARF on linux, the apple ones used on macOS. In which case this may > simply be a skipIfDarwin test, I don't know. If this is a difference in behavior between the DWARF accelerator tables used on linux versus the apple accelerator tables used on macOS, it's an interesting question of whether this is pointing out a bug in the apple accelerator table support in lldb or something to do with how the tables are set up. If you don't have access to a macOS system to investigate more closely, and you don't think this is indicating a bug or regression in behavior, then I think skipping the test for now on darwin is not unreasonable. My two cents having not looked into any of these changes. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D138612/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D138612 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
