aprantl added a comment.
Generally, I think this can be useful information. I don't have any better
suggestion, but I'd like to ask the room if we think that `<incomplete type>`
is a good message for the end users. (`Forward-declared type`, `type missing
from debug info`, ...?)
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Core/ValueObject.cpp:601
+ if (GetCompilerType().IsForcefullyCompleted()) {
+ destination = "<incomplete type>";
+ return true;
----------------
I don't ha
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D138259/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D138259
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
