labath accepted this revision. labath added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
In D137098#3903547 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D137098#3903547>, @aeubanks wrote: > In D137098#3902140 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D137098#3902140>, @labath wrote: > >> Why is it that the other indexes don't need an equivalent fix? Could it be >> that you just haven't tried those code paths? >> >> If they do need it, then it'd be good if we could make the fix in a single >> place. Possibly by putting the retry logic at a higher level? > > Other indexes as in the other manual index indexes? Or as in other higher > level indexes? I meant the compiler-generated indexes (implementations in AppleDWARFIndex and DebugNamesDWARFIndex). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D137098/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D137098 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
