jasonmolenda added a comment.

In D136719#3886254 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D136719#3886254>, @tschuett wrote:

> Looks great, but I would have expected `std::optional<std::string>` and a 
> `nullopt`.

Yeah I'm fine with that, it does seems more natural.  In this case we're 
returning the address of a half-dozen const strings in the text section, so 
there wasn't any lifetime worries or anything, I left it as a char* after 
thinking about it for a few seconds.  I'll update to use a std::string, this is 
not a hot code path, a small object allocation doesn't matter.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D136719/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D136719

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to