thieta added a comment. In D130689#3686723 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D130689#3686723>, @h-vetinari wrote:
> I don't think the standard library can be called a vendor-specific extension, > and so I think this still could/should be made clearer (even though the > status links below would show upon inspection that there's no full support > yet, but that's a bit too tucked away I feel). For libstdc++ and libc++ there are also pages with status in a specific version. Maybe we should link those matrixes as well? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D130689/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D130689 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
