jingham accepted this revision. jingham added a comment. This looks good to me as well. The job of "recreating the object from an eval of the repr output" is not even possible for many SB objects, by the time the object was made it's lost the factory invocation that produced it. And anyway, I also can't see a good use case for this. The fact that this gives us good output in lists of objects is also pretty persuasive.
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D127458/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D127458 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
