clayborg requested changes to this revision.
clayborg added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
Looking great, just a few more fixes. Thanks for making the changes.
================
Comment at: lldb/include/lldb/API/SBProcess.h:348
+ /// \param[in] core_style - Specify the style of a core file to save.
+ /// "minidump" plug-in supports only "eSaveCoreStackOnly".
+ lldb::SBError SaveCore(const char *file_name, const char *flavor,
----------------
Might not need to mention this in the header file as long as the SBError
mentions that it isn't supported in the error message.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/API/SBProcess.cpp:1147
+ SaveCoreStyle core_style) {
+ LLDB_INSTRUMENT_VA(this, file_name, flavor);
----------------
missing core_style in the LLDB_INSTRUMENT_VA macro
================
Comment at:
lldb/test/API/functionalities/process_save_core_minidump/TestProcessSaveCoreMinidump.py:47
+ # validate savinig via SBProcess
+ lldb.SBProcess().SaveCore(core_sb, "minidump", "stack")
self.assertTrue(os.path.isfile(core))
----------------
The 3rd argument is being passed by string value which isn't correct. We need
to use the enumeration.
================
Comment at:
lldb/test/API/functionalities/process_save_core_minidump/TestProcessSaveCoreMinidump.py:47
+ # validate savinig via SBProcess
+ lldb.SBProcess().SaveCore(core_sb, "minidump", "stack")
self.assertTrue(os.path.isfile(core))
----------------
clayborg wrote:
> The 3rd argument is being passed by string value which isn't correct. We need
> to use the enumeration.
We might think about adding a test for "minidump" to save it with a style of
"lldb.eSaveCoreFull" and "lldb.eSaveCoreDirtyOnly" and verify we get an error
back. If this ever changes, then we can modify the test.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D125325/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D125325
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
