yinghuitan added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/tools/lldb-vscode/JSONUtils.cpp:1035
+ // or if we have a synthetic child provider. We don't want to call
+ // "v.GetNumChildren()" on all objects as class, struct and union types don't
+ // need to be completed if they are never expanded. So we want to avoid
----------------
It sucks that `indexedVariables` has be to be filled at container variable
creation time to determine the children number.
A better DAP design would be VSCode asking for children count at container
expansion time. Then we can always call `GetNumChildren()` since all children
will be enumerated anyway.
================
Comment at: lldb/tools/lldb-vscode/JSONUtils.cpp:1055
+ const char *first_child_name = v.GetChildAtIndex(0).GetName();
+ if (first_child_name && strcmp(first_child_name, "[0]") == 0)
+ object.try_emplace("indexedVariables", num_children);
----------------
Do you think if we can handle the map cases? Assuming there is a formatter for
unordered_map<>, if we can detect it and provide paging as well.
================
Comment at: lldb/tools/lldb-vscode/VSCode.cpp:46
[&](const ProgressEvent &event) { SendJSON(event.ToJSON()); }) {
- const char *log_file_path = getenv("LLDBVSCODE_LOG");
+ const char *log_file_path = "/tmp/vscode.txt"; // getenv("LLDBVSCODE_LOG");
#if defined(_WIN32)
----------------
I assume this is your test change? Revert.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D125347/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D125347
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
