hawkinsw added a comment. In D124922#3491190 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D124922#3491190>, @labath wrote:
> Just my opinion, but I wouldn't like to complicate the logging architecture > with file-only log statements and cross-channel dependencies. If you want to > cross-reference some other logging channel with the executed commands then > I'd say you should enable both channels. We can definitely talk about making > the command feature more prominently in the log stream. Thanks! I am just trying to be helpful! You are suggesting that the user would always add `commands` to what you `enable` in order to have this feature? Ie, `log enable -f lldb.out lldb break commands` The only reason that would be less than ideal for me (personally) is that there is lots of other output that comes along with `commands` that I might not necessarily want. Again, just trying to be helpful! Again, I am happy to do whatever the group consensus is!! Just happy to participate! Will Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D124922/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D124922 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
