labath added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Language/CPlusPlus/LibCxx.cpp:658 + if (!using_bitmasks) + capacity *= 2; if (size == LLDB_INVALID_OFFSET || capacity == LLDB_INVALID_OFFSET || ---------------- philnik wrote: > This should only be done if the string is in the normal layout and little > endian or in the alternate layout and big endian. Why do you care about the > capacity at all? Isn't that just another point of failure? I've added the layout check and made a note that big-endian is not supported. The capacity check comes from <https://reviews.llvm.org/D73860>, but I'm not sure of the overall purpose. I guess it was trying to screen out corrupt/uninitialized string objects, but I'm not convinced that we're doing anyone a favour by refusing to format those -- after all, the application itself might access such objects without checking the capacity, and operate on the data that we've decided to ignore. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D124113/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D124113 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits