dexonsmith added a comment.
> Includes two test fixes (since chained mappings are no longer allowed)
> and adds a new test for multiple overlays.
Are we sure no one needs to support chained mappings? Has there been a
~~clang-dev~~ discourse discussion about it already? Just concerned that some
vendor might rely on being able to support this.
================
Comment at: llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h:1284
- StringRef getFileName() { return FileName; }
+ StringRef getFileName() const { return FileName; }
----------------
bnbarham wrote:
> Should this be in a change all by itself?
Yes, but I also know you already split this out so I guess you just need to
rebase :).
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D121426/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D121426
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
