ilya-nozhkin added a comment. In D119548#3318995 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D119548#3318995>, @labath wrote:
> I think that could be achieved by "hijacking" the process events in the case > of a synchronous launch, similar to how we do it for synchronous resumes > (compare Process::Resume and Process:ResumeSynchronous) -- except that this > may be slightly trickier to implement because some of our (platform-specific) > launch code already hijacks these events. Oh, I didn't notice your answer when I was updating the diff. Yeah, I think, it will work perfectly even if platform-specific code hijacks events (it is done in the same thread, so, no race should happen, we only need to catch any events that weren't catched by platform-specific code). I'll try to implement this approach. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D119548/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D119548 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
