kastiglione added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectMemory.cpp:1695 + section_sp = section_sp->GetParent(); + section_name = section_sp->GetName(); + } ---------------- aprantl wrote: > Why did `section_sp->GetName();` return the Segment name in the original > code? Is that a bug? The original code is traversing the parent chain of sections, which for mach-o ends up on the segment. Now that I have learned the address range printed is for the segment, then it makes sense why the segment name alone is printed. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D116419/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D116419 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
