jingham added a comment. I worry this makes the case where a function has two definitions of the same type in one function a more confusing error than the "can't find type" error you would get without this patch. Is this of sufficient urgency that we can't take the time to fix it correctly?
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D115277/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D115277 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
