zequanwu marked an inline comment as done.
zequanwu added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/test/Shell/SymbolFile/NativePDB/find-functions.cpp:89
+// FIND-OVERLOAD: FuncType: id = {{.*}}, compiler_type = "int (void)"
+// FIND-OVERLOAD: FuncType: id = {{.*}}, compiler_type = "int (char)"
+// FIND-OVERLOAD: FuncType: id = {{.*}}, compiler_type = "int (char, int, ...)"
----------------
zequanwu wrote:
> rnk wrote:
> > I guess the test isn't able to differentiate whether these methods are
> > static, private, etc. =/
> >
> > We can overlook that for now, but I think now is the time to invest in
> > better testing tools. The lldb-test program can do whatever you need it to,
> > I don't think changing it requires updating that many tests, I think it's
> > something you should look into.
> There is already a way to get those info (static, virtual, except access
> type) using `lldb-test symbols --dump-ast ...`. It prints `Clang::Decl` which
> has those info. However, it has a bug in NativePDB plugin. It prints the
> methods twice. Maybe we can just check once for each method in the test?
>
> `lldb-test symbols --find=functions` prints `lldb_private::Function` which
> doesn't have those info (static/virtual).
>
> So, we can either just use `lldb-test symbols --dump-ast ...` but check only
> once for each method or use `lldb-test symbols --find=functions`.
>
> Both commands just crash without this change.
D115062 adds access type when dumping the ast using `lldb-test symbols
--dump-ast`.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D113930/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D113930
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
