clayborg added a comment.

Thinking about this a bit more after Pavel's comment on if performance was 
improved due to mangling: we don't currently get any perf improvement from 
mangling/demangling. We might be able to get better performance out of this as 
well if we _do_ cache the "mangled/demangled" counterparts (save both strings 
when they are related instead of just saving the mangled string like I do in 
this patch) when we serialize the Mangled objects. When the objects are 
deserialized, they could read both strings and then no demangling would need to 
happen for that mangled name since it could be registers as the counterpart 
strings during deserialization...


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D113789/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D113789

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to