labath added a comment. In D111409#3124075 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D111409#3124075>, @teemperor wrote:
>> Are you asking for dedicated physical resources for running nightly builds? > > I don't think any of the current bots have a Java installation so I think > it's either that or we get someone with a bot to setup the required Java > installation. I don't have a problem with installing the necessary packages on the bot I manage, but I cannot subscribe to tracking down any failures (or flaky tests!) for this configuration (and, in my experience, any new feature like this is going to have flaky tests). Flaky tests (probably just one) are the reason that lua integration is not enabled on this bot. > FWIW, if no one wants to host a bot for this then I won't mind testing this > in own CI <https://ci.teemperor.de>, but I am not using buildbot so we'll > have to see if that is acceptable for the community (I could also migrate it > to buildbot, but the buildbot interface is just painful to use and I would > prefer not to). I would rather not proliferate test infrastructures. I'm not sure which pain points are you referring to, but setting up a buildbot instance is a lot simpler these days than it used to be (in particular, you don't need to track down and install any outdated packages). >> Do you really have a separate build machines for the Python and Lua >> scripting environments? > > Python is more or less mandatory so all LLDB build bots have that. Lua is > tested here: https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/ > > On a more general note: I haven't followed this thread very closely, but I am > surprised that this is now adding a Java REPL to LLDB. I think the original > "Just add Java bindings" seemed like a reasonable patch but I am not so sure > about this. Could we split out the changes for just adding Java bindings to > SWIG (which anyway seems like a standalone patch) and then we can talk about > the whole Java scripting stuff in a separate review. I don't expect the first > one to be controversial so this should also speed things up a bit. +1 Repository: rLLDB LLDB CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D111409/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D111409 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
