mgorny added a comment.

In D108831#3063282 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108831#3063282>, @labath wrote:

> We don't really want to support adding an arbitrary subset of sub-registers, 
> do we? I am thinking if this could be made simpler if it was all-or-nothing. 
> Like, during the initial pass you could check whether the list contains _any_ 
> subregister, and abort if it does. Then the subsequent pass could assume that 
> all subregisters need to be added...

Sure, that makes sense. Should I update AArch64 too?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D108831/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D108831

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to