labath added inline comments.

================
Comment at: 
lldb/test/API/functionalities/data-formatter/stringprinter/main.cpp:42-43
+    //% self.expect_var_path("a.data", summary='"FOOB"')
+    // Should this be "FO\0B" instead?
+    //% self.expect_var_path("b.data", summary='"FO"')
 }
----------------
This would be consistent with gdb as well, and it was the preferred result of 
last years irc straw poll, but it will require a different fix.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D111399/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D111399

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to