labath added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lldb/test/API/functionalities/data-formatter/stringprinter/main.cpp:42-43 + //% self.expect_var_path("a.data", summary='"FOOB"') + // Should this be "FO\0B" instead? + //% self.expect_var_path("b.data", summary='"FO"') } ---------------- This would be consistent with gdb as well, and it was the preferred result of last years irc straw poll, but it will require a different fix. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D111399/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D111399 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits