mgorny marked 4 inline comments as done.
mgorny added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Utility/DynamicRegisterInfo.cpp:441
+
+ reg_to_regs_map to_add;
+ for (uint32_t value_reg : m_value_regs_map[reg_num]) {
----------------
labath wrote:
> Maybe call this new_invalidates? I've found it hard to track what to_add
> means, with all the mixing of value_regs and invalidates...
Good idea.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Utility/DynamicRegisterInfo.cpp:443-444
+ for (uint32_t value_reg : m_value_regs_map[reg_num]) {
+ if (value_reg == LLDB_INVALID_REGNUM)
+ break;
+
----------------
labath wrote:
> Is this still needed?
Probably not indeed.
================
Comment at: lldb/unittests/Process/Utility/DynamicRegisterInfoTest.cpp:184-190
+ struct RegisterInfo ah_reg {
+ "ah", nullptr, 1, LLDB_INVALID_INDEX32, lldb::eEncodingUint,
+ lldb::eFormatUnsigned,
+ {LLDB_INVALID_REGNUM, LLDB_INVALID_REGNUM, LLDB_INVALID_REGNUM, ah,
ah},
+ value_regs, nullptr, nullptr, 0
+ };
+ info.AddSupplementaryRegister(ah_reg, group);
----------------
labath wrote:
> Could we remove ah from this test, as its offset is going to be wrong?
Sure.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D110023/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D110023
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
