emrekultursay added a comment. In D109797#3005885 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D109797#3005885>, @labath wrote:
> I'm not sure all of this is relevant. I've just tried to debug a very simple > (linux) executable that does a dlopens a library. If I attach to the > executable before the dlopen call, lldb does not notice the new library. This > patch fixes the issue. So I guess the test could be just that. You could do > something similar to TestLoadUnload -- either add a new test case which > attaches to that binary, or use it as inspiration to write a new test. PTAL. I added a new `dlopen` test for this. I can only test on Linux at the moment, so LMK if there's something I need to do to support more platforms or remove them from testing matrix. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D109797/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D109797 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
