jasonmolenda added a comment. This is much more comprehensive than what I was thinking of, nicely done. The mapping of the Exception Class in the esr reg to a name is AArch64 specific, not Apple specific, isn't it? I haven't looked in the ARM ARM, but I suspect it's just the specific names you're using here which might be what we use at apple, but the exception codes are the same for any AArch64 target.
What do you think about printing the FAR register value (in particular) in the stop message? For many exception types, it contains the address that was relevant to the fault iirc, and even if we don't explicitly spell out what that relationship is (it's prob going to be different for each exception code), just having it printed may be helpful for a human reading the message. I think the patch is fine if you prefer it this way, just giving some other ideas. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D109795/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D109795 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
