labath added a comment. In D100256#2685807 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100256#2685807>, @mgorny wrote:
> In D100256#2685632 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100256#2685632>, @labath wrote: > >> Does this actually need to be a function? It seems like this could just be a >> pointer variable (or two), pointing into our pool of processes. I'd consider >> making a small struct to group the current process and the current thread >> within that process. > > I suppose a pointer might work for the proposed design. However, I'm > wondering why we have the `GetID()` check here — can we have an invalid value > of `m_debugged_process_up` then? I think someone was just being overly cautious. I'm pretty sure the check is redundant... CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D100256/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D100256 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits