mgorny added a comment. In D98822#2637871 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D98822#2637871>, @jingham wrote:
> The gdb model - since gdb only supports one debugee per gdb - is to either > follow the fork or follow the parent. It would be more in keeping with > lldb's model to make a new target for the child side of the fork, and use > that to follow the child. That way you can continue to debug both the parent > and the child processes. It doesn't look like you've gotten that far yet, > but IMO that's the direction we should be going for lldb. Long-term, sure. Between life and deadlines, we're only working on the simpler one process model right now. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D98822/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D98822 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
