tammela added a comment.

In D94937#2511222 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D94937#2511222>, @JDevlieghere 
wrote:

> I replied before I actually tried to understand what your'e trying to 
> achieve, and it's still not entirely clear to me. I think what you need is 
> something similar like `python-typemaps.swig` which helps swig understand 
> `char**` types and such.
>
> For context, originally SWIG wasn't great at handling `std::string`s (which 
> has since been fixed) and the designers of the SB API were worried about the 
> ABI stability of the `std::string` class. None of these are concerns anymore 
> today, but the ABI being stable means we're stuck with it for now. If we ever 
> do an SB API v2, this is definitely one of the things we'd fix, but currently 
> there are no plans for that.

That's exactly what I need, thanks. I will adjust accordingly.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D94937/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D94937

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to