labath accepted this revision.
labath added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
I don't know omitting this had any practical effects (my experiments with rax
were... inconclusive) , but it definitely sounds like the right to do.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Utility/RegisterInfos_x86_64.h:93
{
\
#reg #i, nullptr, sizeof(uint64_t),
\
LLVM_EXTENSION FPR_OFFSET(
\
----------------
mgorny wrote:
> To be honest, I completely don't get the indentation below.
Yeah... You could try explicitly re-indenting the block to see whether it
produces something better. If not, it's likely a clang-format bug (though I
can't really blame it for getting this mess wrong)
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D91728/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D91728
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
