labath accepted this revision. labath added a comment. In D91612#2399408 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D91612#2399408>, @DavidSpickett wrote:
> I presume these tests aren't commonly run or have been masked by the expected > failures. Yes, that seems to be the case, though I don't actually see a reason for that. This is definitely the right fix, though it seems that we have a bigger problem in that one of the decorators is misbehaving and causing the tests not to run. My money is on `@skipIf(remote=False)` Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D91612/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D91612 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
