omjavaid added a comment. In D91422#2396697 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D91422#2396697>, @labath wrote:
> My guess is that this is because of the extra debug registers that you're > exposing. You'll notice that Get(User)RegisterSetCount returns just a number, > and this means that it is not really possible to selectively disable register > sets -- all you can do is disable the ones that come last. > > We ran into a similar problem on arm with @omjavaid. > > For the time being, we may be able to work around this by making the debug > registers come earlier in the list (after ensuring they work on linux). Or we > could hide them on BSDs as well... Register sets are stored in statically which means we have to honor the order as @labath pointed out. Ideally register sets array should be a dynamic list with all currently available registerset inserted in the list. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D91422/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D91422 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
