sgraenitz added a comment. That's right, but I don't see how even the static ones could be resolved. Wouldn't it hard-wire the objects together? In the next session we want to load some object files from cache while others have changed.. Maybe one day I should check how ccache and the likes handle it.
IIRC OSO entries in MachO files point to the object file on disk, which allows LLDB to load them lazily? The DWARF parsing for ELF should follow the same laziness: each section is only relocated once we need it. It's just not loading the object lazily right? However, we couldn't do that even with OSO-style entries, because there is no "pull mechanism" in JITLoaderGDB :) Well, for now it just works. I will leave the review here for another day or so, in case there's more feedback. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D90769/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D90769 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
