dblaikie added a comment. In D90598#2368020 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D90598#2368020>, @labath wrote:
> Judging by http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-October/145990.html, > dsymutil has a similar bug... That's my understanding. It means I'm not sure (though I'm not the expert here - certainly leave final decisions up to @aprantl and @JDevlieghere ) how this will be fixed, since lldb will presumably still need to be able to parse/understand old dsyms using the incorrect absolute offsets. (we had a similar problem once with DW_OP_bit_piece, where it was implemented incorrectly in both LLVM and lldb and I'm not sure how the backwards compatibility story was addressed there). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D90598/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D90598 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
