Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was frequently offline.
On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks everyone! > > I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if > everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you > move all the green bots back there. > > Thanks > > Galina > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> > wrote: > >> They do on staging. >> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >> >> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? >> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. >> >> >> >> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <r...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot >>> annotated commands: >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK for >>> now. >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should >>>> be a functional equivalent of the old one. >>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build >>>> bot. >>>> >>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the >>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. >>>> >>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Galina >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <r...@google.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < >>>>> lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> They are online now - >>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >>>>>> >>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. >>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it >>>>>> will need more love and care. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting >>>>>> AnnotatedCommand. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and >>>>> another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use >>>>> more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test >>>>> steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the >>>>> buildbot >>>>> master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can >>>>> run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the >>>>> script. >>>>> >>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need >>>>> some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >>>>> >>>>
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
