labath added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Linux/NativeProcessLinux.cpp:1350
-Status NativeProcessLinux::AllocateMemory(size_t size, uint32_t permissions,
- lldb::addr_t &addr) {
-// FIXME implementing this requires the equivalent of
-// InferiorCallPOSIX::InferiorCallMmap, which depends on functional ThreadPlans
-// working with Native*Protocol.
-#if 1
- return Status("not implemented yet");
-#else
- addr = LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
-
- unsigned prot = 0;
- if (permissions & lldb::ePermissionsReadable)
- prot |= eMmapProtRead;
- if (permissions & lldb::ePermissionsWritable)
- prot |= eMmapProtWrite;
- if (permissions & lldb::ePermissionsExecutable)
- prot |= eMmapProtExec;
-
- // TODO implement this directly in NativeProcessLinux
- // (and lift to NativeProcessPOSIX if/when that class is refactored out).
- if (InferiorCallMmap(this, addr, 0, size, prot,
- eMmapFlagsAnon | eMmapFlagsPrivate, -1, 0)) {
- m_addr_to_mmap_size[addr] = size;
- return Status();
- } else {
- addr = LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
- return Status("unable to allocate %" PRIu64
- " bytes of memory with permissions %s",
- size, GetPermissionsAsCString(permissions));
+llvm::Expected<uint64_t>
+NativeProcessLinux::Syscall(llvm::ArrayRef<uint64_t> args) {
----------------
How much of this would be useful for BSDs? Should some of this be pushed to the
base classes?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D89124/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D89124
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
