Author: Vedant Kumar Date: 2020-09-17T16:54:58-07:00 New Revision: 4926a5ee63017396e1c55b1505f9fd2bed858218
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4926a5ee63017396e1c55b1505f9fd2bed858218 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4926a5ee63017396e1c55b1505f9fd2bed858218.diff LOG: [lldb] Clarify docstring for SBBlock::IsInlined, NFC Previously, there was a little ambiguity about whether IsInlined should return true for an inlined lexical block, since technically the lexical block would not represent an inlined function (it'd just be contained within one). Edit suggested by Jim Ingham. Added: Modified: lldb/bindings/interface/SBBlock.i Removed: ################################################################################ diff --git a/lldb/bindings/interface/SBBlock.i b/lldb/bindings/interface/SBBlock.i index 812b41fe5c3e..3972b939b18b 100644 --- a/lldb/bindings/interface/SBBlock.i +++ b/lldb/bindings/interface/SBBlock.i @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ public: ~SBBlock (); %feature("docstring", - "Does this block represent an inlined function?" + "Is this block contained within an inlined function?" ) IsInlined; bool IsInlined () const; _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
