labath added a comment.

In D79699#2215216 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D79699#2215216>, @omjavaid wrote:

> @labath Any further action needed on this change? I have updated test main.c 
> for doing asm write to SVE regs and then reading them back during testing. 
> Also i have removed NativeProcessLinux_arm64 dependence on 
> LinuxPTraceDefines_arm64sve.h.  We are using sys root's ptrace.h as SVE 
> marcros are back ported in most versions of ptrace.h.

Almost. I have two more questions/requests inline.



================
Comment at: 
lldb/test/API/commands/register/register/aarch64_sve_registers/rw_access_static_config/TestSVERegisters.py:100-106
+        has_sve = False
+        for registerSet in currentFrame.GetRegisters():
+            if 'Scalable Vector Extension Registers' in registerSet.GetName():
+                has_sve = True
+
+        if not has_sve:
+            self.skipTest('SVE registers must be supported.')
----------------
Are you sure this will work if the system does not support SVE? I would expect 
the test application to die from SIGILL (or something) long before we reach 
this part.

Even if it does work, it will mean that the test will be skipped (instead of 
failing) if the lldb-server stops reporting the sve registers (or even if it 
just slightly changes the register set name). That's why I was originally 
suggesting to check for SVE support from within the inferior process.

Is there a simple way to do that? I'm assuming there must be, otherwise the 
application could not detect whether it can use sve...


================
Comment at: 
lldb/test/API/commands/register/register/aarch64_sve_registers/rw_access_static_config/TestSVERegisters.py:134
+        for i in range(16):
+            self.expect("register read " + 'p%i' % (i), substrs=[p_regs_value])
+
----------------
So, the program sets all p registers to the same value (0xffff..) right? Would 
it be possible to introduce some variance there (like you did for the z 
registers), to ensure that the registers are actually read from the right place?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D79699/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D79699

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to