jingham added a comment. In D83327#2136814 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D83327#2136814>, @davide wrote:
> Aside from cosmetics, I'm not entirely sure this is the correct fix. Why are > we calling this code _at all_ if the type is incomplete? Doing so allows one to write a synthetic child provider that provides the fields for an incomplete type. This is useful if you don't have debug info for a given type but know its layouts by some other means. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D83327/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D83327 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
