labath accepted this revision. labath added a comment. Yes, this looks better, though I am mildly worried about the use of timeouts.
There probably isn't anything better we can do for the "launch" case, but we could definitely come up with something better for the "attach" case. I think we can leave the attach code as-is for now, as the symmetry with the launch code is nice, but this will need to be revisited if the test turns out to be flaky. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D81200/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D81200 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
