labath added a comment.
Looks fine to me too. The way this test is phrased, it would probably make more
sense under `test/API/python_api/value`, than here. (I mean, it's not
technically wrong because everything is a "functionality", but i'd like to
avoid putting stuff here precisely because the category is so vague.)
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp:5228
case clang::Type::RValueReference: {
const clang::ReferenceType *reference_type =
llvm::cast<clang::ReferenceType>(qual_type.getTypePtr());
----------------
teemperor wrote:
> If you feel like refactoring this (by deleting code): You can also just
> delete all this and add the `RValueReference` and `LValueReference` to the
> `ObjCObjectPointer` above. `GetPointeeType` there is doing the same as the
> lines below and handles all ptrs/references. But that's optional.
+1 for merging this stuff
================
Comment at: lldb/test/API/functionalities/pointer_num_children/main.cpp:13-14
+ Outer outer{&inner};
+ auto Ptr = &(outer.inner);
+ auto &Ref = outer.inner;
+ return 0; // break here
----------------
Since this test doesn't deal with `auto` in any way, I think we should just
follow the llvm style guide here and spell out the type explicitly.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D80254/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D80254
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
