labath added a comment. In D76672#1939377 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D76672#1939377>, @JDevlieghere wrote:
> In D76672#1938629 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D76672#1938629>, @labath wrote: > > > It's not clear to me why this is needed. > > > > I mean, if lldb touches any of the files inside the dsym bundle, then they > > should be automatically recorded already, right? And if it doesn't then it > > does not need them... > > > The dSYM can contain other resources than just the Mach-O companion file, > such as script for the OS plugins or opt remarks, which might not be used by > the reproducers or even LLDB at all. Once you have the reproducer on your > system, tools will find and use it because spotlight indexed it. Having only > a partial dSYM is really undesirable as it can break LLDB and other tools in > really unexpected ways. Interesting. Could that be fixed by adding the funny `.noindex` suffix to the reproducer name (or some subdirectory of it)? Repository: rLLDB LLDB CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D76672/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D76672 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
