labath added a comment.
The approach seems reasonable to me.
================
Comment at: lldb/unittests/Language/CPlusPlus/CPlusPlusLanguageTest.cpp:153-155
+ // We expect these cases to fail until we turn on C++2a
+ // {"A::operator<=><A::B>", "A", "operator<=><A::B>"},
+ // {"operator<=><A::B>", "", "operator<=><A::B>" },
----------------
You could add these to the "EXPECT_FALSE" list below
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D76168/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D76168
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits