labath marked an inline comment as done.
labath added inline comments.

================
Comment at: 
lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/GDBRemoteCommunicationClient.h:429
+  /// Use qOffsets to query the offset used when relocating the target
+  /// executable. Currently, we only support relocating all sections by the 
same
+  /// amount.
----------------
clayborg wrote:
> So I am not advocating supporting the full QOffsets packet at all. Just 
> splitting up the contents of GetExecutableOffset so that GetQOffsets() grabs 
> the exact output and chops it up. No need to implement any true 
> functionality. So the code would be identical to what you have, but the 
> GetQOffsets() will just return the array of strings that contains the chopped 
> up return value. Since this class is GDBRemoteCommunicationClient, and if 
> someone new comes in and wants the results of QOffsets to do something, the 
> code is already there. Right now is implemented, but hidden inside 
> GetExecutableOffset. So no functionality, just have GetQOffsets() return the 
> data from the packet. Let me know what you think. Not a blocker, I would just 
> prefer that any packet that GDB remote protocol handles has a raw access 
> function.
Ok, I see what you mean. The new patch now has a function which extracts all 
the data from the qOffsets response. I was trying to avoid doing that (I could 
take some shortcuts if I assumed all offsets have to be same), but overall 
difference is not that big..


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D74598/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D74598



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to